ChillTheKeel
5:11 Fri May 21
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
He was pretty woeful in his last two bids to be leader, but he's the best of a seriously bad bunch.
|
Lee Trundle
5:10 Fri May 21
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Sadiq KHAN is doing his best to stay relevant.
|
Block
5:09 Fri May 21
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
He's a monumental cunt, though.
|
ChillTheKeel
5:08 Fri May 21
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
I can't think of anyone other than Burnham to unite the current shambles and at least try and oppose the government.
|
Kaiser Zoso
4:39 Fri May 21
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
If he goes, kronic, who’s next in line?
|
ChillTheKeel
4:37 Fri May 21
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Imagine being so shit that even Abbott is rinsing you.
|
riosleftsock
4:09 Fri May 21
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Capitol Man 1:17 Sat May 15
Re: Khan in election trouble
The photo is thing is a bit of a stupid pick up from right wing American politics. Neither the UK or US has any issues with voter fraud to warrant a change.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'm saving that one.
|
Kaiser Zoso
4:08 Fri May 21
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Tories on track to take 399 seats in next general election
It comes as Diane Abbott says losing the Batley and Spen by-election would mean "curtains" for Sir Keir Starmer.
lol
|
Capitol Man
1:17 Sat May 15
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
The photo is thing is a bit of a stupid pick up from right wing American politics. Neither the UK or US has any issues with voter fraud to warrant a change.
|
Darlo Debs
1:15 Sat May 15
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Chester fair point, except you just reminded me that i can't probably retire for another about 20 years at this rate, so.i.now have the right 'ump
|
ChesterRd
1:10 Sat May 15
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
People who are 65 are still of working age, the notion that a significant number are old biddies who don't have any photo ID is bollocks. You need to be looking closer to 80 year before you start getting significant numbers without photo ID.
|
Darlo Debs
12:47 Sat May 15
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Ok.i'm.stumped, i genuinely.don't know how to.respond to.that
|
Hammer and Pickle
12:19 Sat May 15
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
I'm quite certain that given the opportunity in the season of the year, I'd rather frolic with Debs.
|
Darlo Debs
12:16 Sat May 15
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
No, i just look it 😡
|
Cabbage Savage
10:41 Fri May 14
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Darlo Debs 6:01 Wed May 12
I gess that you are older than 60. Korret?
|
Darlo Debs
6:01 Wed May 12
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Lee i wasn't talking about postal voters that seemed to.be Rios concern. I was addressing the point made on TV news that there was an issue with older voters. (Specifically over 65s).
|
Mike Oxsaw
5:55 Wed May 12
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Darlo Debs 5:32 Wed May 12
Then maybe a better analysis would be one of postal voter age against location?
I thought that one of the main issues was whole communities applying for postal voting, then handing their papers over to one person to complete and send off.
In any case, I'd be happy for photo ID to be introduced if it helped prevent somebody voting as "me" before I'd even got the chance to decide what I wanted for breakfast in the morning.
|
Lee Trundle
5:52 Wed May 12
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/apr/21/uk.election20052
Labour voters make up most of the postal voters, according to that. Its a few years old, though.
|
Darlo Debs
5:32 Wed May 12
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
I was talking about older voters being more likely to vote Tory
Re the postal voters i was saying that in response to.Rios concerns in the subject. I don't know if they will make it harder, he seemed concerned there was an issue with it.
|
master
5:28 Wed May 12
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
Only one way to find out. Just have to wait to the relevant election and compare turnout and numbers turned away.
Absolutely no sense in hypothesising lots of what if scenarios and then not trying it out on the basis of that. That'd just be stupid.
|
Johnson
5:27 Wed May 12
Re: Khan in election trouble
|
What evidence do you have for;
a) Rules making postal voting harder?
b) Postal voters being traditionally Tory voting?
|
| 
